Sunday, January 11, 2015

Into the Woods: A Review


I'm not entirely sure why Fairy Tales have become such big business in recent years. It seems like every other weekend there's some new movie or TV show offering a twist or reinterpretation on the stalwart stories of the Brothers Grimm. Maybe it has something to do with a mass psychological need for stories of simple morality, where good deeds are rewarded and wickedness punished, in light of the current morally gray and complex culture we find ourselves in at the moment. Who knows, I'm a film critic not an anthropologist. But it's not surprising that with the renewed interest that we'd eventually get a film version of the original subversive take on classic Fairy Tales, Stephen Sondheim's musical Into the Woods. Presented with all the pomp and star power Disney can provide, the new adaptation is an uneven but nonetheless enjoyable outing at the movies.

And just to be upfront, this review is based on only the new film. I haven't seen the original stage production so how good of an adaptation it actually is, I have no idea. That established, our story primarily follows a Baker (James Corden) and his wife (Emily Blunt) in a standard fairy tale setting whose greatest wish is to have a child. A Witch (Meryl Streep) has cursed the Baker's family though, because his father stole from her garden years ago. But the Witch informs the couple that she will lift the curse if they can bring her four specific items before the blue moon in three days time. So the pair head off, um, into the woods to collect them, crossing paths with Cinderella, Little Red Riding Hood, Jack (of beanstalk fame), and Rapunzel whom are all chasing after their own wishes. As all these characters help & hinder one another, everyone eventually reaches their happily ever after. But as the consequences of their time in the woods come home they all begin to wonder, just how happy are they?

Monday, January 5, 2015

The Interview: A Review


It's not every movie that causes an international incident. By now, it's safe to assume that most people have heard of The Interview, a comedy starring James Franco and Seth Rogen as journalists attempting to assassinate North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Un during a live TV interview, and the bizarre circumstances of its release. After a predictable outcry from the North Korean propaganda machine, the film's studio Sony had its computers hacked and terrorist threats were issued against any theater that dared to show the movie. That caused Sony to pull The Interview just weeks before its planned Christmas release and cancel any plans to release it at all. Only for that to cause a backlash here in the States, calling Sony out for their cowardice and independent screenings planned in protest. Ultimately Sony relented, giving The Interview a limited theatrical release and making it available to view online for a nominal fee. Just for the record, I saw the film in a theater and was attacked by exactly zero North Koreans. I tell you all this because the controversy surrounding this film is actually more interesting than the film itself.

Not that it's a bad movie but for all the hullabaloo and saber-rattling from that wacked Orwellian slice of Asia that the end result is so average can't help but feel disappointing. I'll get to why, but first a little expansion on the premise. Franco is Dave Skylark, host of a popular but brainless celebrity interview tabloid who with the help of Rogen as his producer Aaron Rappaport is able to coax shocking secrets and revelations out of even the most guarded of guests. Despite their popularity, the two are aiming to enhance their credibility in the TV news world and think they've found their chance when they learn that Kim Jong-Un is a huge fan of Skylark's. They set up an interview with the reclusive dictator in North Korea but are forcibly recruited by the CIA to kill Kim while on air to destabilize his regime. Being idiots though, Skylark and Rappaport screw things up as soon they arrive in the Hermit Kingdom. Skylark finds himself being charmed by Kim and begins having second thoughts about the assassination while Rappaport comes under suspicion from a particularly patriotic North Korean official.